AI Assurance Operations

Your audit function wasn't built for AI. Your evidence shouldn't be either.

AssuranceOps helps organizations produce structured, defensible evidence for AI systems — use case inventories, testing records, oversight documentation, and monitoring evidence that regulators and auditors actually need.

The problem

Traditional audit evidence doesn't cover AI risk

Most audit teams are equipped to review access controls, change management, and uptime. They are not equipped to review outcome monitoring, drift detection, bias testing, explainability, or human oversight evidence.

Traditional Audit Checks

AI Assurance Requirements

Access control logs
Outcome monitoring across subgroups
Change management tickets
Model drift detection evidence
Uptime monitoring
Testing and validation records (bias, accuracy, fairness)
Ticket approvals
Human oversight checkpoints and override logs
Static policy review
Explainability and decision rationale evidence
Incident escalation logs
Post-deployment monitoring and incident reporting
Vendor risk questionnaires
AI use case inventory with risk classification

If your evidence package can't answer these questions, it can't defend your AI systems to a regulator, a court, or a board.

Output

Structured AI assurance evidence — not screenshots, not spreadsheets

AI-003: Claims Triage Model

Risk ClassificationHigh
Testing RecordBias eval, accuracy, fairness — Q1 2026
MonitoringDrift threshold: active
Human ReviewMonthly — named reviewer
Regulatory MappingEU AI Act Art. 9, 11, 13, 14
Evidence HashSHA-256 verified

AI-007: HR Screening Tool

Risk ClassificationHigh
Testing RecordAdverse impact analysis
MonitoringSelection rate tracking
Human ReviewQuarterly — HR + Legal
Regulatory MappingNYC LL144, EEOC guidance
Evidence HashSHA-256 verified

AI-012: Customer Service Chatbot

Risk ClassificationMedium
Testing RecordAccuracy, hallucination checks
MonitoringEscalation rate tracking
Human ReviewWeekly sample review
Regulatory MappingNIST AI RMF
Evidence HashSHA-256 verified
Capabilities

Four capabilities. One evidence layer.

01

AI Use Case Inventory

Catalog every AI system in the organization with risk classification, ownership, deployment status, and regulatory applicability. The foundation for knowing what you need to govern.

02

Testing & Validation Records

Structured evidence of pre-deployment and ongoing testing — bias evaluations, accuracy benchmarks, fairness testing across subgroups, adversarial testing, and red-team exercises. Timestamped, hashed, and mapped to control requirements.

03

Oversight & Human Review Packs

Evidence that human oversight exists and functions — named reviewers, review frequency, override rates, review duration, escalation triggers, and board-level summaries. Designed to answer: "Can you prove a human meaningfully reviewed this?"

04

Monitoring & Drift Evidence

Post-deployment evidence — performance baselines, drift detection thresholds, alert configurations, incident logs, and remediation records. Continuous, not point-in-time.

Regulatory landscape

The deadlines are real

Aug 2026

EU AI Act

High-risk obligations effective August 2, 2026 — including risk management, technical documentation, human oversight, post-market monitoring, and incident reporting.

Active

NYC Local Law 144

Annual bias audits required for automated employment decision tools. Enforcement tightening after December 2025 Comptroller audit.

Referenced

NIST AI RMF

Govern, Map, Measure, Manage framework increasingly referenced by US regulators as the baseline for AI risk management.

2026

Colorado AI Act

Takes effect 2026. Requires "reasonable care" to protect consumers from discrimination by high-risk AI systems.

These aren't future requirements. They're current obligations. The evidence needs to exist now.

Get started

Start with a 20-minute AI Assurance Diagnostic

We'll map your current audit coverage against AI assurance requirements and identify the gaps. No pitch. Just a clear picture of where you stand.

Which AI systems are in customer-facing or material workflows
What evidence currently exists for testing, monitoring, and oversight
Where the gaps are relative to EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, and industry requirements
A prioritized remediation path

An AI Guru® Product

Built by the team behind AI Guru — 60,000+ professionals trained, enterprise AI deployed across financial services, manufacturing, media, and healthcare.

Visit AI Guru →

Build defensible AI assurance evidence

Start with a diagnostic. Get a clear picture of your coverage gaps.